FOODI CASE STUDY

A 10-Point Food Cost Improvement on the Signature Item of a $2M Restaurant.

How Foodi helped a $2M restaurant identify and address food-cost opportunities that had a meaningful impact on the economics of the business.

$2M

Annual restaurant revenue

40% → 30%

Brisket plate cost — a 10 percentage-point improvement

±12% → ±3%

Yield variance between shifts

Verified engagement metrics. The 40% → 30% figure is a 10 percentage-point reduction in the plate cost of the restaurant's highest-cost item — not a change in total food cost across the menu. Foodi does not publish extrapolated dollar savings that the underlying data does not support.

Small percentages create big dollars in restaurants.

At $2M in annual revenue, a single point of food cost is roughly $20,000 of sales dollars a year. That is why an operator cannot afford to carry cost drift on their highest-volume items — and why the difference between a 40% plate and a 30% plate is not a rounding error.

$20K

1 point of food cost on $2M in annual sales

$40K

2 points of food cost on $2M in annual sales

$100K

5 points of food cost on $2M in annual sales

Illustrative calculation based on reported revenue only. It shows what a point of food cost is worth at $2M in sales — it is not a statement of this restaurant's realized savings. Actual financial impact depends on the restaurant's underlying food-cost structure, menu mix, and other operating factors.

THE BUSINESS PROBLEM

The restaurant had the data. It didn't have a consistent operating system for turning that data into action.

A fast-growing BBQ concept in Houston was losing margin on its signature protein. The pitmaster was excellent. The numbers were invisible.

Food-cost visibility

No live read on what a plate actually cost. Vendor increases surfaced at month-end, on a P&L that was already 30 days old.

Recipe costing

Brisket, rub, and sides were never costed in the POS. The most expensive item on the menu was priced on instinct.

Portion & yield control

Trim loss and cook loss swung ±12% between shifts. The same cut produced a different plate cost depending on who worked it.

Purchasing & vendor pricing

Protein pricing moved without anyone catching it. There was no purchase history being used at the negotiating table.

Management accountability

No weekly cadence tied a manager to a number. Cost review happened quarterly, if at all.

THE OPERATING BASELINE

Before Foodi

$2M

Annual revenue

40%

Brisket plate cost — the highest-cost item on the menu

±12%

Yield variance, shift to shift

None

Live price visibility — vendor hikes caught at month-end

WHAT FOODI DID

Find → Identify → Prioritize → Act → Measure

01
FIND

Establish visibility into true food-cost performance

Foodi built the full recipe tree for brisket, rub, and sides inside Craftable, mapping every vendor item down to the plate. For the first time the restaurant could see what a portion actually cost — not what it was assumed to cost.

02
IDENTIFY

Isolate the operational drivers behind the variance

The drivers were specific and measurable: trim and cook loss swinging ±12% between shifts, and vendor protein pricing moving without detection. Brisket — the single highest-cost item — carried most of the exposure.

03
PRIORITIZE

Focus on the changes with the largest financial impact

Rather than reworking the whole menu, the work concentrated on the item with the most dollars behind it: brisket yield discipline, and the primary protein vendor agreement backed by 90 days of purchase data.

04
ACT

The team implemented the operating changes

A weekly count cadence on trim yield and cook loss, recorded every Monday before the rush. A renegotiated primary vendor agreement plus a secondary supplier for lean trim, locking in better tier pricing.

05
MEASURE

Track the result and make the rhythm repeatable

Menu re-costing moved from quarterly to weekly. When market price on brisket moves, margin now moves with it. A Weekly Health Tracker replaced the 30-day-old P&L as the operating instrument.

THE TURNING POINT

The number that mattered: 10 points.

Ten points looks small on a percentage chart. On the plate that drives the most volume in a $2M restaurant, it changes the economics of the menu — and every point of food cost at $2M in sales is roughly $20,000 a year.

40%
Brisket plate cost — before
30%
Brisket plate cost — after

Verified engagement result, achieved in 10 weeks. The $20,000-per-point figure is an illustrative calculation on $2M of revenue, not a reported savings figure for this restaurant.

THE RESULT

The result wasn't another report. It was a better operating number.

10 points

Improvement in brisket plate cost — 40% to 30% — achieved in 10 weeks through yield and vendor discipline.

$2M

Annual revenue

±3%

Yield variance after — down from ±12%

28%

Next target, in progress via portion spec and rub batch-costing

48 hrs

Time to spot a vendor price jump — previously month-end

Weekly

Re-costing cadence — previously quarterly

10 weeks

Time to result

Before Foodi After Foodi

Brisket plate cost
40%
30%
Yield variance
±12% between shifts
±3% between shifts
Operating visibility
P&L at month-end, 30 days old
Weekly Health Tracker, live
Vendor price changes
Noticed at month-end
Spotted within 48 hours
Management process
Quarterly menu review
Monday count, weekly re-costing
Recipe costing
Not costed in the POS
Full recipe tree in Craftable

Restaurant operators don't run their business in percentages. They run it in dollars.

An improvement in food cost isn't just a better-looking KPI. It changes how much money the restaurant keeps from every dollar of sales.

$2,000,000

Annual revenue

10 points

Improvement in brisket plate cost — verified

~$20,000

Illustrative annual sales-dollar value of one point of food cost at $2M

For a $2M restaurant, a few percentage points can represent six figures.

Illustrative calculation. The verified 10-point improvement applies to the plate cost of one item, so it cannot be multiplied directly against total revenue. Foodi reports what the data supports and labels every extrapolation as an illustration rather than a realized saving.

Foodi didn't just measure the problem. Foodi helped build the operating discipline to fix it.

Foodi worked with the restaurant team to establish the systems, visibility, and operating discipline needed to improve food-cost performance — then made that rhythm repeatable so the number couldn't quietly creep back.

Visibility

Every vendor item mapped to the plate inside Craftable.

Accountability

A Monday count that ties a manager to a number before the rush.

Standardization

Yield and portion discipline that survives a shift change.

Weekly rhythm

Re-costing every week instead of every quarter.

Prioritized action

Work aimed at the item carrying the most dollars.

Financial impact

A cost number that moves, and stays moved.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR RESTAURANT OWNERS

The lesson isn't that every restaurant will find ten points.

The lesson is that percentage points matter. In a $2M restaurant, a single point of food cost is roughly $20,000 of annual sales dollars — so a handful of points on the items that drive volume can reach six figures. The opportunity in your restaurant depends on your current food cost, revenue, purchasing, menu mix, labor model, and operating discipline.

Foodi's job is to find out where your opportunity is.

The story · at a glance

Swipe through the case study

Case study intro — Cutting brisket cost without cutting quality
The Challenge — brisket cost had crept to 40%
The Approach — three systems built with Craftable
The Result — brisket cost down to 30%, targeting 28%

What's hiding inside your restaurant's numbers?

Foodi helps restaurant operators find the operational issues that are costing them money, prioritize the highest-value opportunities, and build a better weekly operating rhythm.

Talk to Foodi · (704) 497-0546